The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Punjab National Bank
High Court
17 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Punjab National Bank
Date of order
17 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
1997-1998
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Punjab National Bank, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether interest earned on Government securities and bonds are chargeable to tax under Section 5 read with Section 2 (5) and 2 (7) of the Interest Act?” 3.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~R 38
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 729/2005
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
M/S PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ..... Respondent
Through
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R17.01.2018
This appeal by the Revenue under Section 21 of the Interest Tax Act, 1974 read to Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 pertains to Assessment Year 1997-1998 and arises from Interest Tax Appeal No. 52/Del/2001 and impugns order dated 18[th] January, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Punjab National Bank formerly Known as P.N.B. Capital Services Limited.
2. By order dated 1[st] December, 2005, the appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of low:-
“1. Whether interest earned on Government securities and bonds are chargeable to tax under Section 5 read with Section 2 (5) and 2 (7) of the Interest Act?”
3. The issue in question is covered against the Revenue-Appellant by the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur Vs. Sahara India Savings and Investment Corporation Limited, (2009) 17
SCC 43 and Commissioner of Income Tax, Gandhinagar Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation, (2016) 388 ITR 484 SC. 4. The question of law is accordingly answered against the Revenue and in favour of the respondent-assessee. The appeal is disposed of. There would be no order as to costs.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
JANUARY 17, 2018 MR/NA
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.