In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Radhakrishna Silk Mills, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1201 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) 500 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Vs.
M/s Radhakrishna Silk MIlls .... Respondent
Mr. A. Kotangale for the Appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
1) As the issue of law involved in this matter
is covered by the judgment of this Court reported
in 248 I.T.R. 723 (Bom), learned counsel seeks
leave to withdraw the motion and the appeal.
Motion along with the Appeal dismissed, as
withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue