Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ra...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Kumar And Party

High Court 04 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Kumar And Party
Date of order
04 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Kumar And Party, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No.401/2014 In D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.205/2009 The Commissioner Of Income Tax Versus M/s Rajesh Kumar And Party ----Petitioner ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Parinitoo Jain withMs. Shiva Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR Order 04/01/2019 The delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.The application being D.B. Civil Misc. Application No.1235/2014filed for condonation of delay is allowed. For stated reasons, the application is allowed. Theperemptory order dated 12.08.2014 as also the consequentialorder dated 10.10.2014 are recalled. The appeal is restored to itsoriginal number and stage. The office to list the appeal todayitself. This also disposes of application bearing inwardno.81724/2018 filed for withdrawal of the appeal. (GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J //Jaiman109
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan