The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rajshree International
High Court
24 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rajshree International
Date of order
24 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rajshree International, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1124 OF 2005IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.450 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax.Vs.
..Appellant...Respondent.
M/s. Rajshree International.
Mr. A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadev for the Appellant.
Mr. S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 24th March,2008.
PC :
1. There is a delay of 60 days. Considering the cause
shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.450 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Rajshree International...Respondent.Mr. A.D. Kango with P.S.Sahadev for the Appellant.Mr. S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 24th March,2008.PC :1. The questions of law as framed in Para-4 of theAppeal memo are covered by the judgment of this courtreported in 267 ITR 488. In the light of above, thequestions of law as framed would not arise andconsequently the appeal dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue