In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Reliance Indl. Infrastructure, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.173 OF 2008ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.173 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2422 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantVs.
M/s Reliance Indl. Infrastructure... RespondentLtd.Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/by Raj Darak for Respondent
P.C. :-
1)Heard learned counsel for the appellantand learned counsel for the respondent. Perusedthe affidavit filed in support of the Notice ofMotion. The Motion is filed for condonation of69 days delay in filing the above appeal.Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay.There is no case of inaction, negligence or wantof bonafide on the part of the appellant. Noticeof Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a). Appeal be numbered.
2)Appeal be placed on board for admissionafter two weeks.
3)Notice of Motionis disposed ofaccordingly with no order as to costs.
( DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.