The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Roha Dyechem Ltd
High Court
09 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Roha Dyechem Ltd
Date of order
09 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Roha Dyechem Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1182 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 606 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Roha Dyechem Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr.A.D. Kango for the Appellant.
Mr.Rajesh Shah for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: OCTOBER 09, 2007
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 09, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. There is delay of 364 days in preferring the
appeal. There is affidavit in support of the
motion. The order dated 11.10.2004 was received on
24.12.2004. The file was sent to the Ministry of
Law on 27.4.2005 and draft appeal was received on
15.12.2005. There is no explanation for the delay
between the period of 27.4.2005 and 15.12.2005. The
cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence, Motion dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue