Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. R...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Roha Dyechem Ltd

High Court 15 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Roha Dyechem Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Roha Dyechem Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1183 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 604 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Roha Dyechem Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants. Mr. Rajesh Shah for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007 P.C. P.C. . The delay is of 364 days. There is affidavit in support of the motion. The order was received on 24.12.2004. The file was sent to Ministry of Law on 27.4.2005. The draft appeal memo was received on 15.12.2005. The court fees were made available on 9.3.2006 and the appeal was filed on 7.4.2006. There is no explanation for the delay between 27.4.2005 and 15.12.2005. Considering the above, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan