In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sachin J. Nanavati, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1832 OF 2009IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2779 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s. Sachin J. Nanavati
..Appellant..Respondent
Mr. J.S. Saluja for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 15[th] June,2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Inspite of service nobody is appearing for the respondent. The affidavit of service is taken on record. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay of 182 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute. Registry is directed to register the appeal and place it for admission.
Sd/-
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
sd/-
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue