The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sahney Kirkwood P Ltd
High Court
02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sahney Kirkwood P Ltd
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sahney Kirkwood P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1285 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 306 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s. Sahney Kirkwood P Ltd
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. J.S. Saluja for the Appellant.Mr. R. Murlidharan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 2nd July, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay of 112 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute.
All objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
This appeals is taken up for hearing by consent of Revenue. The Tribunal has relied upon the order passed for assessment years 1991-92, 1995-96 and 1999-2000. The said orders barring the order for the assessment year 1999-2000 and were not challenged by the Revenue. So far as the appeal directing the Assessing Officer’s order for the assessment year 1999-2000 is concerned, the same bearing Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2197 of 2006 came to be dismissed by an order dated 18.12.2007. The question arising out of the impugned order revolves around appreciation of evidence and after appreciating the evidence the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding of fact with which no fault can be found. In this view of matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.