The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Satyanarayan Sekhsaria
High Court
04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Satyanarayan Sekhsaria
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Satyanarayan Sekhsaria, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 146 OF 200
5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 146 OF 200
5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 146 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Satyanarayan Sekhsaria
Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan
for the Appellant.
Mr. A.R. Singh with Mr. P.K. Parida for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 04, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 04, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for revenue had contended
that the judgment of the tribunal is non speaking
order. Yet considering the question of law and
considering the Judgment of the Supreme Court in
Hiro Exports Vs. CIT (2007) 295 ITR 454 (SC), the
question as framed in Para 4(b) and (c) of the
appeal memo would not arise. Consequently appeal
disposed of.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue