In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Senzo Engineering P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1477 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s Senzo Engineering P Ltd
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. Nishant Thakkar i/b Mulla & Mulla for the Respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 23rd June, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, appeal is taken up for hearing. During the course of hearing we were taken to the order passed by the Tribunal. The question arising out of the impugned order revolves around appreciation of evidence and after appreciating the evidence the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding of fact with which no fault can be found. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue