The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sheena Exports
High Court
17 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sheena Exports
Date of order
17 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sheena Exports, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
The Commissioner of Income Tax.
Vs.
M/s Sheena Exports.
I.T.A. No.769 of 2010 (O&M)Date of decision: 17.1.2011
-----Appellant.
-----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:-Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Standing counselfor the Revenue.
---
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
1.This appeal has been preferred by the revenue underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”)against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NewDelhi dated 16.10.2009 in I.T.A. No.295/Del/2007 proposing toraise following substantial question of law:-
“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Hon’ble ITAT was right in law in upholdingthe order of the CIT(A), directing the AssessingOfficer to allow deduction u/s 80 HHC, on exportincentives, received by the assessee as a supportingmanufacturer in the same manner, as in the case ofdirect exporter?”
2. It is not disputed on behalf of the revenue that similarappeal being ITA No.916 of 2008 CITv. M/s Sheena Inds.,
Panipat, has already been dismissed by this Court vide orderdated 23.11.2009.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
January 17, 2011ashwani
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.