Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Shiva Trading Corp., Mumbai

High Court 03 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Shiva Trading Corp., Mumbai
Date of order
03 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Shiva Trading Corp., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
T IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 261 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4623 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax.. Vs. M/s Shiva Trading Corp., Mumbai. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Vmal Gupta, for the Appellant.Mr S.G.Lakhani, for Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 3[rd] AUGUST, 2011. P.C.: Heard counsel for the Revenue and the Respondent. 2.This Notices of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of delay of 470 days in filing the notice of motion and for setting aside the order dated 21.7.2009. The affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion does not disclose sufficient cause for condoning the delay. However, looking to the stakes involved, in our opinion, interest of justice would be met if the delay is condoned subject to payment of costs. Accordingly, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b), subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Office objections to be removed within two weeks from today. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan