Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shree Krishna Silk Industries Pvt. Ltd

High Court 30 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shree Krishna Silk Industries Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
30 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shree Krishna Silk Industries Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the above, in our opinion, there is no merit in the appeal which is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.993 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Shree Krishna Silk Industries Pvt. Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar with mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. Counsel with Mr. S.G.Lakhani for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 30th March, 2009. PC : 1. Revenue is in appeal on the following questions. Assessing Officer under Chapter XIVB of the Act? officer in the course of block assessment to disallow the said amount. 3. Considering the above, in our opinion, there is no merit in the appeal which is accordingly dismissed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan