Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shreeji Gems Limited

High Court 25 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shreeji Gems Limited
Date of order
25 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shreeji Gems Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 80 HHC and other provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal erred in upholding the order of the C.I.T.(A) and directing the Assessing Officer to consider the Foreign Exchange gain of Rs.17,20,760/- arising as a result...

Decision: For the reasons set out therein, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2007 ssioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Shreeji Gems Limited ... Respondent Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009 P.C. P.C. . The Revenue has come in appeal on the following question : "The Substantial question of law arises in the present appeal is regarding the true scope and correct interpretation of Sec. 80 HHC and other provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal erred in upholding the order of the C.I.T.(A) and directing the Assessing Officer to consider the Foreign Exchange gain of Rs.17,20,760/- arising as a result of exchange gain for earlier years arising as a result of exchange rate fluctuation, as export turnover as against the income from other sources and to calculate the deductions u/s. 80 HHC?" 2 . Similar question has come up for consideration in Income Tax Appeal No. 1249 of 2007 in the case of C.I.T.-20 Vs. M/s. Amber Exports (India) decided on 18.2.2009. For the reasons set out therein, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan