The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shreeji Gems Limited
High Court
25 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shreeji Gems Limited
Date of order
25 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shreeji Gems Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 80 HHC and other provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal erred in upholding the order of the C.I.T.(A) and directing the Assessing Officer to consider the Foreign Exchange gain of Rs.17,20,760/- arising as a result...
Decision: For the reasons set out therein, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2007
ssioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Shreeji Gems Limited ... Respondent
Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009
DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009
DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009
P.C.
P.C.
. The Revenue has come in appeal on the following
question :
"The Substantial question of law arises in
the present appeal is regarding the true
scope and correct interpretation of Sec. 80
HHC and other provisions of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 and whether on the facts and
circumstances of the case and in law the
Hon’ble Tribunal erred in upholding the
order of the C.I.T.(A) and directing the
Assessing Officer to consider the Foreign
Exchange gain of Rs.17,20,760/- arising as a
result of exchange gain for earlier years
arising as a result of exchange rate
fluctuation, as export turnover as against
the income from other sources and to
calculate the deductions u/s. 80 HHC?"
2
. Similar question has come up for consideration in
Income Tax Appeal No. 1249 of 2007 in the case of
C.I.T.-20 Vs. M/s. Amber Exports (India) decided
on 18.2.2009. For the reasons set out therein,
there is no merit in this appeal which is
accordingly dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.