The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shri Khodiyar Gems
High Court
19 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shri Khodiyar Gems
Date of order
19 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Shri Khodiyar Gems, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3839 OF 2006
IN
I.T.A. (L) NO. 2250 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Shri Khodiyar Gems ... Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Ms. Asifa Khan for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. This is a notice of motion for condoning delay of
575 days in filing the main tax appeal. On perusal
of the affidavit in support of the notice of Motion,
we find that the file was sent to the Law Ministry
for drafting the appeal memo on 19.04.2005 and
thereafter the appeal was not drafted till
07.11.2006. In our view, the period between
19.04.2005 and 07.11.2006 has not been properly
explained. In the circumstances, sufficient cause
is not shown to condone the delay. Hence, Notice of
Motion is dismissed.
((-2-))
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue