In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Smegy Polymers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Appeal NO. 908 of 2000
The Commissioner of Income-tax .... Appellant.
vs.
M/s. Smegy Polymers Pvt. Ltd. ... . ... Respondents
Mr. E. S. Chopra for Appellant Mr. Ajay Singh i/b.K. Gopal for Respondents.
CORAM:S. RADHAKRISHNAN
ANDA. S. AGUIAR JJ.
Date: 7/6/2005
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S. Radhakrishnan J.)
1.Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and the
Respondents.
2. By this appeal the appellant is seeking to raise the following question
of law :
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the
case, the Tribunal was justified in law inallowing depreciation on plant and machinerywhich were not put to commercial use in the
previous year?
3. We have perused the judgment and order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal dated 15.2.2000 wherein in para 5 it is clearlyindicated that there is ample material to indicate that the Petitionersare entitled to claim depreciation. We also do not find anysubstantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal isdismissed.
S. RADHAKRISHNAN J.
A. S. AGUIAR J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.