Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Special Steels Ltd

High Court 04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Special Steels Ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Special Steels Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 161 OF 200 5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 161 OF 200 5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 161 OF 200 The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant Versus M/s. Special Steels Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. P.C. Tripathi for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 04, 2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: MARCH 04, 2008 P.C. . The Assessing Officer had held in favour of the Assessee that the expenditure was in respect of the expansion of existing business. The Commissioner (Appeal) reversed the findings holding that the business sought to be done was different from the existing business. The tribunal found that this is a factual error. The tribunal on the facts came to the conclusion that the new business is an expansion of existing business and does not warrant being treated as a new business itself. Considering the factual finding of fact, the question of law would not arise and consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan