Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sridivya Trading Pvt. Ltd

High Court 18 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sridivya Trading Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. Sridivya Trading Pvt. Ltd.. Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. J.D. Mistri with Mr. P.C. Tripathi and Mr. Raj Darak for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009 R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Though three questions have been framed, the question which arises is the same. This question was question No. 3 in Income Tax Appeal No. 607 of 2005 in the case of C.I.T. Vs. M/s. Akshay Textiles Trading decided on 17.10.2007. Considering the judgment of this court, the question as framed would not arise. Consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.