The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Star India P. Ltd
High Court
24 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Star India P. Ltd
Date of order
24 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Star India P. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Considering the above, in our opinion, the appeal does not survive which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Star India P. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the
Appellant.
Mr. Poras Kaka with Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The revenue is in appeal against the order of the
tribunal and has framed the question of law in Para
4 of the appeal memo.
. In so far as question (a) is concerned is
pertaining as to the actual date when the assesseee
is held entitled to the commission. The learned
counsel for the Respondent has placed before us a
chart for different assessment years. The same is
taken on record and marked "X1". That would show
that even if the commission is worked out as
suggested by the Revenue or as suggested by the
assessee, the taxable component would be the same.
The question therefore, need not be considered and
gone into.
(-2-)
. In so far as second question is concerned, the
tribunal recorded a finding of fact. That expenses
has been incurred on advertisement. In the light of
that, this is purely a question of fact. The
question of law would not arise. In so far as third
question is concerned, it is an additional ground
raised by the assessee which has been referred to
the A.O. for consideration according to law.
. Considering the above, in our opinion, the appeal
does not survive which is accordingly dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.