The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Stovec Screens India Pvt
High Court
25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Stovec Screens India Pvt
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Stovec Screens India Pvt, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Issue: The following question was referred in both the References : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the perforated nickel rotary screens manufactured by the assessee in its factory can be regarded as "Industrial machinery" within the meaning of Item No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 111 OF 1989
WITH
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 134 OF 1988
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Applicant
Versus
M/s. Stovec Screens India Pvt.
Ltd. Bombay. ... Respondents
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for Applicant.
Mr. J.D. Mistry with Ms.Toral Shah i/by Tyabji
Dayabhai for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: JULY 25, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The following question was referred in both the
References :
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the perforated nickel rotary screens
manufactured by the assessee in its factory can be
regarded as "Industrial machinery" within the
meaning of Item No. 8 of the 9th Schedule to the
Income tax Act, 1961 to entitle the assessee to get
initial depreciation in respect of its plant and
machinery in its factory under section 32(1)(iv) of
the Income tax Act, 1961?"
((-2-))
. The tax incident in both the cases is less than
four lakhs. In the light of that reference returned
as unanswered.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.