The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sumatinath Enterprises
High Court
06 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sumatinath Enterprises
Date of order
06 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Sumatinath Enterprises, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.242 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2607 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax.
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s. Sumatinath Enterprises.
..Respondent.
Mrs.Anuradha Mane with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant.
Mrs. V.B. Mane for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY,2009.
PC :
1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 1378 days
delay in filing the main appeal.
2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on17.2.2005 but the appeal was filed on 5.8.2008. Thereis no proper explanation for the delay caused betweenthe period 17.2.2005 and 5.8.2008. In our view,therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficientcause. Notice of motion is therefore dismissed.
Consequently appeal dismissed. Certified copy
expedited.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue