In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Superior Financial Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to pay the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. the office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. delay in filing the appeal was caused on account of their negligence.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2154 OF 2007IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1092 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax.Vs.M/s. Superior Financial ConsultancyServices Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. A.S.Rao and Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY,2008.
PC :
1. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.There is a delay of 174 days. Considering the causeshown, delay condoned subject to the appellant paying tothe respondent costs quantified at Rs.2500/- ascondition precedent within 12 weeks from today. On
failure to pay the costs within stipulated period,
appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution.
the office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for non
prosecution.
delay in filing the appeal was caused on account of
their negligence.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue