The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Trent Limited
High Court
02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Trent Limited
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Trent Limited, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Failure on the part of the Appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondents, Appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondents without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1518 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 747 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
M/s Trent Limited
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 2nd July, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay of 20 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute.
Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve all unserved respondents within four weeks from today.
Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted.
Failure on the part of the Appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondents, Appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondents without reference to the Court.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue