Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. U...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Unicom Trading Enterprises

High Court 21 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Unicom Trading Enterprises
Date of order
21 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Unicom Trading Enterprises, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 94 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Vs. M/s. Unicom Trading Enterprises Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant. Mr. J.D. Mistry with Mr. Raj Darak for Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: AUGUST 21, 2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 21, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . The learned counsel fairly concedes that the similar question of law which was raised in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lazor Synte Limited in ITA. No. 11 of 1999 decided on 11.6.2007 has been rejected. In view of the above, the question of law as formulated would not arise. Hence, appeal dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan