The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Uniflex Cables Ltd
High Court
15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Uniflex Cables Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Uniflex Cables Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 291 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s. Uniflex Cables Ltd.
..Appellant..Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 321 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Amitava Mukherjee
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Jas Sanghavi i/b PDS Legal for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 15[th] June,2009
DATE :
Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve unserved respondent within four weeks from today.
Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted.
Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue