Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. V...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Vantherp, Aurangabad

High Court 25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Jul 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Vantherp, Aurangabad, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

((-1-)) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Versus M/s. Vantherp, Aurangabad ... Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale for Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: JULY 25, 2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: JULY 25, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . As the incidence of this appeal is less than 4 lakhs, the learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Hence, appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fee as per rules. No order as to cots. C.C. expedited. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.