Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. W...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Wimco Ltd. Mumbai

High Court 12 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Wimco Ltd. Mumbai
Date of order
12 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Wimco Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: If the office objections are not removed, the appeal to stand dismissed without further orders from this court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 37 OF 2009 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 37 OF 2009 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 37 OF 2009 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3002 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3002 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. WIMCO Ltd. Mumbai. ... Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009 R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the cause shown particularly in Para 4(7) and after hearing the counsel, in our opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause. In the light of that, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal provided office objections are removed within six weeks from today. If the office objections are not removed, the appeal to stand dismissed without further orders from this court. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan