The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Wimco Ltd. Mumbai
High Court
12 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Wimco Ltd. Mumbai
Date of order
12 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Wimco Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: If the office objections are not removed, the appeal to stand dismissed without further orders from this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 36 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2999 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 36 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2999 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. WIMCO Ltd. Mumbai. ... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for
Appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown particularly in Para
4(7) and after hearing the counsel, in our opinion,
the same would amount to sufficient cause. In the
light of that, delay condoned. Office to register
the appeal provided office objections are removed
within six weeks from today. If the office
objections are not removed, the appeal to stand
dismissed without further orders from this court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.