Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Y...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Yusuf Ahmed & Co

High Court 10 Aug 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Yusuf Ahmed & Co
Date of order
10 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Yusuf Ahmed & Co, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 447 of 1995 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Applicant. vs. M/s. Yusuf Ahmed & Co. ... Respondent Mr. Parag Vyas for Applicant.Mr. S. V. Pikole for Respondent. CORAM: V. C. DAGA AND A. S. AGUIAR JJ.Date: 10[th ] August, 2005. P. C.: 1. By this reference under section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act , 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the followingquestions of law for the opinion of this court: questions of law for the opinion of this court: “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition ofRs.91,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on accountof bundi loans invoking the provisions of section 69D ofthe Income Tax Act , 1961 which apply to the facts ofthe case? the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition ofRs.91,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on accountof bundi loans invoking the provisions of section 69D ofthe Income Tax Act , 1961 which apply to the facts ofthe case? 2. Heard learned counsel for both sides. Perused referenceproceedings. proceedings. 3. For the reasons recorded by us in our judgment dated 1[st] July 2005 passed in Income Tax Reference No. 397 of 1988 (C.I.T. vs. M/s. Pithwa Engg. Works), wherein we have relied upon decision of thiscourt in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v/s. CamcoColour Co., reported in ITR Vol. 254 (2002), page 565 we do notthink it necessary to answer the reference made to this Court for theAssessment Years 1976-77 and 1977-78, having negligible taxeffect. Accordingly, reference stands returned unanswered withno order as to costs. (A. S. AGUIAR J.) -x- (V. C. DAGA J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan