The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Zest Holdings Pvt. Ltd
High Court
09 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Zest Holdings Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Zest Holdings Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4510 OF 2007ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4510 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2409 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... AppellantVs.M/s Zest Holdings Pvt. Ltd.... Respondent
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 9TH APRIL, 2008
P.C. :-
1)Heard learned counsel for the appellantand the learned counsel for the repondent. TheMotion is filed for condonation of 949 days delayin filing the above appeal. Perused the affidavitfiled in support of the Notice of Motion. Theimpugned order is dated 11-11-2005. The ChiefCommissioner of Income Tax granted approval on5/4/2007 for filing the appeal. However, theappeal was filed on 03-10-2007 i.e. after the
lapse of 18 months. The reasons given for thedelay in filing the appeal is due to preparationof Memo of Appeal and non availability of courtfee stamps. The reasons given are totallyunsatisfactory. No case is made out for condoningthe delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed with noorder as to costs.
2)Notice of Motionis disposed of
accordingly with no order as to costs.
( DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.