The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akay Organics Pvt.ltd
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akay Organics Pvt.ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.akay Organics Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.907 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.907 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Akay Organics Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.S.S.Shetty for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 7th August, 2008
DATE : 7th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Since the original papers are misplaced, we have
allowed the learned Counsel for the Appellant to tender
the set of photocast copies of Appeal papers and the
said photocast set is treated as reconstructed set of
Appeal proceedings.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Both the
learned Counsel for the parties categorically state that
the only question of law raised in this Appeal is
squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of ACIT V/s.J.K.Synthetics Ltd. -
ACIT V/s.J.K.Synthetics Ltd. -
(2001) 251 ITR 200 (SC
(2001) 251 ITR 200 (SC), in favour of the Revenue and
(2001) 251 ITR 200 (SC
against the Assessee. Accordingly, the question of law
raised in this Appeal is answered in favour of the
Revenue and against the Assessee.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.