In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.anil Impex, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. .As the tax effect is less than Rs.4/- lac inthe above Appeal, the learned Counsel Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the same. the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed assuch. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.772 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.M/s.Anil Impex
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the Appellant.Mr.Jitendra Singh i/b.K.Gopal for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
.As the tax effect is less than Rs.4/- lac inthe above Appeal, the learned Counsel Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the same.
the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed assuch.
.
Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the
Appellant, as per rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
for the
Hence,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue