In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.apple Finance Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.92 OF 2007
IN
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.10 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Apple Finance Ltd.
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.J.D.Mistri with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.
Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 07/12/2005 i.e.
after a lapse of almost a year.
2.The reasons given for delay that of getting the
reasons given for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice
of Motion stands dismissed.
3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion,
Interest Tax Appeal (L) No.10 of 2006 also stands
dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue