The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.aristocrat Marketing Ltd
High Court
11 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.aristocrat Marketing Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.aristocrat Marketing Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.705 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Aristocrat Marketing Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.J.S.Saluja for appellant.
None for respondent.
P.C.Heard.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 11[th] June,2009
DATE :
The learned Counsel for the Revenue fairly states, that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) in the case of M/s.Blow Plast Ltd. in ITA No.7357 and 7358/Bom/91, which is accepted by the Revenue. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal. The appeal is, therefore, stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue