The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Export House
High Court
28 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Export House
Date of order
28 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Export House, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.954 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.954 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Asiatic Export House .. Respondent
Mr.Parag Vyas i/by Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 28th July, 2008
DATE : 28th July, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state
that the question of law raised in this Appeal is
squarely covered against the Assessee and in favour of
the Revenue, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s.K.Ravindranathan
CIT V/s.K.RavindranathanNair - (2007) 295 ITR 228. Accordingly, the question of
Nair - (2007) 295 ITR 228.
Nair - (2007) 295 ITR 228. Accordingly, the question of
law raised in this Appeal is answered in favour of the
Revenue and against the Assessee. Appeal stands
disposed of.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.