Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.as...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Export House

High Court 28 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Export House
Date of order
28 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Export House, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.954 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.954 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Asiatic Export House .. Respondent Mr.Parag Vyas i/by Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Ms.Asifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 28th July, 2008 DATE : 28th July, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state that the question of law raised in this Appeal is squarely covered against the Assessee and in favour of the Revenue, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s.K.Ravindranathan CIT V/s.K.RavindranathanNair - (2007) 295 ITR 228. Accordingly, the question of Nair - (2007) 295 ITR 228. Nair - (2007) 295 ITR 228. Accordingly, the question of law raised in this Appeal is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee. Appeal stands disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan