The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Properties Ltd
High Court
15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Properties Ltd
Date of order
15 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.asiatic Properties Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.594 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.594 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.594 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2120 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2120 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Asiatic Properties Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.S.M.Shah for the Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 15th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 1312 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice
of Motion. It appears that the last date for filing of
the Appeal was 05.02.2004, however the Appeal came to be
filed belatedly on 12.09.2007. We are not satisfied
with the reasons given for condonation of delay. The
reasons given for delay that of getting the draft memo
of Appeal prepared and the administrative difficulties
including non-availability of Court fee stamps etc.
does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause
is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of
Motion stands dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income
Tax Appeal (L) No.2120/2007 also stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue