The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.atlanta Infrastructure Ltd
High Court
22 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.atlanta Infrastructure Ltd
Date of order
22 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.atlanta Infrastructure Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.896 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.272 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. .. Respondent
Ms.P.P.Bhosale for the appellant
None for the respondent
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2008
DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2008
P.C.:
1. None appears for the respondent though
served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 321 days’ delay caused in
filing the Appeal challenging the order dated
27.09.2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal.
2
2. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion. It appears that though the
Commissioner of Income Tax had granted approval for
filing an Appeal on 22.03.06, the Appeal came to be
filed belatedly on 06.03.07 i.e. after a lapse of
almost one year.
3. We are not satisfied with the reasons given
for condonation of delay. The reasons given for
delay is that administrative difficulties and does
not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause
is made out for condonation of delay. Hence,
Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
4. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 272 of 2007 also
stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.