The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bajaj Hindustan Ltd
High Court
13 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bajaj Hindustan Ltd
Date of order
13 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bajaj Hindustan Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above, Appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.383 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.383 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Ms.Vasanti B.Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 13th August, 2008
DATE : 13th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. This Appeal has already been admitted by this
Court on 25.08.2004 on two substantial questions of law.
So far as the first question of law is concerned, the
learned Counsel for both the parties state that the same
is covered against the Assessee and in favour of the
Revenue in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of Britannia Industries Ltd.V/s.CIT -
Britannia Industries Ltd.V/s.CIT -278 ITR 546. Hence, the said first question of law on
278 ITR 546.
which this Appeal has been admitted, is answered against
the Assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
2. So far as the second question of law is concerned,
the learned Counsel for the Appellant is not pressing
the same.
3. In view of the above, Appeal stands disposed of.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.