The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.beekaylon Industries Ltd
High Court
05 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.beekaylon Industries Ltd
Date of order
05 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
2002-03, 2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.beekaylon Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter the appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.806 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Beekaylon Industries Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 5TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the Tribunal has relied on its earlier order which was passed in the case of assessee itself for the A.Y.2002-03. The same order is relied upon in the impugned order of the Tribunal which is meant for A.Y.2004-05. He further submits that the earlier order of the Tribunal for the A.Y.2002-03 has not been challenged by the Revenue. In other words, it has been accepted by the Revenue. Under these circumstances, if the reliance is placed on that judgment of the Tribunal which has been accepted by the Revenue, we do not see any substantial question of law in the present appeal. In this view of the matter the appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.