Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bi...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.birla Yamaha Ltd

High Court 13 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.birla Yamaha Ltd
Date of order
13 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.birla Yamaha Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.404 OF 2001 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.404 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Birla Yamaha Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Ms.A.Vissanji with Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 13th August, 2008 DATE : 13th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Appeal has already been admitted by this Court on 20.04.2004 on two substantial questions of law mentioned in the said order. So far as the first question of law is concerned, the learned Counsel for both the parties state that the same is covered against the Assessee and in favour of the Revenue in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Britannia Industries Ltd.V/s.CIT - 278 ITR 546. Britannia Industries Ltd.V/s.CIT - 278 ITR 546. Hence, Britannia Industries Ltd.V/s.CIT - 278 ITR 546. the said first question of law is answered against the Assessee and in favour of the Revenue. 2. So far as the second question of law is concerned, the learned Counsel for both the parties state that the same is covered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Padamjee Pulp & Paper Mils Ltd.V/s.CIT - 210 ITR Padamjee Pulp & Paper Mils Ltd.V/s.CIT - 210 ITR97. Hence, the second question of law is answered in 97 favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. Appeal stands disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan