The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.black & Veatch Ltd
High Court
26 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.black & Veatch Ltd
Date of order
26 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.black & Veatch Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1188 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.390 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.M/s.Black & Veatch Ltd.
Mr.S.M.Shah for the Applicant.Mr.P.T.Pardiwalla i/b.Rajesh Shah & Co. for theRespondent.
..Applicant
..Respondent
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 26TH JUNE, 2007
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion the Applicant is seekingcondonation of delay in filing the above Appeal.Perused the Notice of Motion and theaffidavit-in-support thereof as well as the additionalaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For thereasons stated therein sufficient cause is made outfor condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal.There is no case of inaction, negligence or want ofbonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue