Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.b....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.b.v.jewels

High Court 10 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.b.v.jewels, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: By 2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4038 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2497 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.B.V.Jewels ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.S.M.Shah for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By 2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.