The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.castle Investment & Inds.p.ltd
High Court
22 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.castle Investment & Inds.p.ltd
Date of order
22 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.castle Investment & Inds.p.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: By this Appeal, the following substantial question of law is sought to be raised:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s.80M of the I.T.Act 1961?
Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1557 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1557 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Castle Investment & Inds.P.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd July, 2008
DATE : 22nd July, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. By
this Appeal, the following substantial question of law
is sought to be raised:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case, the Hon’ble Tribunal is justified in law in
holding that the assessee is entitled for deduction
u/s.80M of the I.T.Act 1961?
2. Perused the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal dated 18.7.2007. For the reasons stated in
paragraph Nos.18, 19 & 20 of the said judgment, we find
no question of law involved in this Appeal. The
Tribunal has followed its own decision as referred to in
paragraph No.20 of the judgment, which has not been
challenged by the Revenue. No substantial question of
law is involved in this Appeal. Hence, the Appeal
stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.