In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chandulal Surajmal, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty resorted in favour of the revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1889 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.433 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income TaxVersusM/s.Chandulal Surajmal
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Learned counsel appearing for the revenue submits that because of the mistake of the tribunal, the appeal has been filed for assessment year 1999-2000. He submits that even the annexures annexed to the appeal memo are wrongly annexed. Under these circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file fresh appeal.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty resorted in favour of the revenue. No costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue