Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ch...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.cheay Investment (P) Ltd

High Court 03 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.cheay Investment (P) Ltd
Date of order
03 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.cheay Investment (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1914 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1914 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1914 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1055 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1055 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Cheay Investment (P) Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr.Percy Pardiwala i/by Dadich & Co.for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 3rd June, 2008 DATE : 3rd June, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion the Appellant is seeking condonation of 224 days delay caused in filing the Appeal, which is over and above the prescribed statutory period of 120 days. Perusal of the affidavit in support shows that the delay was caused due to non-availability of Court fee stamps and for other reasons beyond the control of the Appellant’s office including that of administrative difficulties and the voluminous work etc. The aforestated reasons given by the Appellant however does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is shown for condonation of delay. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion, the ITXA (L) No.1055/2007 also stands dismissed. (A.P.BHANGALE J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.P.BHANGALE J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan