Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ch...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Bros. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 23 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Bros. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Bros. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2152 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.865 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Vs. M/s.Chhabria Bros. Pvt. Ltd......Respondents Mr. Ashok Kotngale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Apellant. Ms. Beena Menon i/.b.D.M. Harish & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&A.A.SAYED,JJ.DATED: 23RD JULY,2007 A.A.SAYED DATED: 23RD JULY,2007 P.C.: P.C.: . We find that the papers were sent to the Ministry of law on 28th August, 2003. The draft appeal memo was ready on 20th February, 2004 and the Appeal was filed on 21st July, 2004. There is no explanation for the delay between 20th February, 2004 and 21st July, 2004. Considering that the delay is of 324 days we in our opinion the same does not amount to sufficient cause and hence Motion dismissed. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan