Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ch...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Polyesters Corpn

High Court 20 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Polyesters Corpn
Date of order
20 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Polyesters Corpn, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255 Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.819 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.819 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.819 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Chhabria Polyesters Corpn. .. Respondent Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan for Appellant. Mr.F.V.Irani with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 20th August, 2008 DATE : 20th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Vyas, the learned Counsel for the Appellant is not pressing this Appeal in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s.G.M.Mittal Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255 Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255. Hence, the Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255 Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan