The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Polyesters Corpn
High Court
20 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Polyesters Corpn
Date of order
20 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.chhabria Polyesters Corpn, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255 Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.819 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.819 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.819 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Chhabria Polyesters Corpn. .. Respondent
Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan for Appellant.
Mr.F.V.Irani with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 20th August, 2008
DATE : 20th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Mr.Vyas, the learned Counsel for the Appellant is not
pressing this Appeal in view of the judgment of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s.G.M.Mittal
Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255
Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255. Hence, the
Stainless Steel P.Limited - 263 ITR 255
Appeal stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.