In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.citicrop Securities And Investment Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.774 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.232 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax.
..Appellant.
Vs.M/s.Citicrop Securities and Investment Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr.R.K.Sharma & Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.B.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2008.
PC :
does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, notice of
motion is dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.232 OF 2006
1. As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed,
appeal is also dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue