In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.conwood Agencies Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2295 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Conwood Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta with Ms.A.Vissanji for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 28TH JULY, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Learned Counsel for both the parties fairly state that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal has already been considered by this Court in ITXA No.900 of 2008 in ITXA (L) No.2823 of 2008 and ITXA No.1437 of 2000 in the case of assessee itself vide order dated 3rd July, 2009. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue